top of page

For Best Experience Download Our Mobile App Here:


Note: If Article does not Load Please Login & Subscribe to a Premium Plan here:
[Special Offer] Use Coupon Code
  "JOHN WALTON" at Checkout to get FREE Access for 1 Year


What did the Commissioner know, and when did she know it?

Walton Gate: Unveiling the Scandal Surrounding County Commissioner Donna Johns

In the annals of American political history, few scandals loom as large as Watergate, where Richard Nixon's use of public funds to spy on political opponents became a defining moment.

Now, as we witness a scandal unfolding in Walton County, it seems only fitting to dub it "Walton Gate."

Senator Howard Baker's iconic question during the Watergate hearings, "What did the president know, and when did he know it?" reverberates, finding resonance in our own locale.

The central figure in the Walton Gate scandal is County Commissioner Donna Johns, and the pertinent question remains: What did the commissioner know, and when did she know it?

The crux of the matter revolves around the moment Donna Johns brought private text messages into a public meeting—a move that categorized Walton Gate as a citizen surveillance operation run from within county administration.

Notably, the targeted citizen was Charles Galloway, Johns' political opponent in the previous election, who may challenge her again in 2026.

It's tempting to question whether Johns would have taken such drastic action if she was unaware of the illegal acquisition of these text messages within Walton County government.

The recovery of an iPad, logged into Galloway's account, from inside county administration by the sheriff's office raises eyebrows.

So, what did Commissioner Johns know, and when did she know it?

Despite attempts to distance herself from the origin of the messages, it is crucial to scrutinize whether Commissioner Johns would have displayed them if she knew they were obtained illegally.

Suzanne Harris, the alleged source of the leaked messages, boasted about receiving information from a county employee within county administration.

The unfolding narrative prompts a critical examination: If Commissioner Johns was aware of the illegal nature of acquiring these messages, should the consequences be anything less than resignation or removal from office?

The story continues to develop, and we pledge to keep our readers informed on this evolving scandal.

733 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All


bottom of page