top of page

For Best Experience Download Our Mobile App Here:


Note: If Article does not Load Please Login & Subscribe to a Premium Plan here:
[Special Offer] Use Coupon Code
  "JOHN WALTON" at Checkout to get FREE Access for 1 Year


Walton County Considers Public Comment Reform

In the hallowed halls of Walton County's Board of County Commissioners (BCC) meetings, the concept of public comment, designed to be a cornerstone of democracy, has taken an unexpected turn.

While on the surface, the system appears to uphold democratic ideals, a closer look reveals a pattern of exploitation that jeopardizes the efficiency and efficacy of these crucial gatherings.

Public comment, a time-honored tradition, allows citizens to voice their concerns, support, or opposition on matters at hand.

However, recent developments have showcased a small cadre of individuals exploiting this process, seemingly representing the entire populace when, in reality, their motivations appear politically motivated or rooted in personal vendettas against the county.

BCC meetings, occurring bi-weekly, serve as the primary arena for decision-making. When a motion is made, public comment is triggered, offering citizens a three-minute platform to express their views.

However, the unintended consequence has been the manipulation of this system by a select few, turning what should be a democratic process into a stage for individual agendas.

It's essential to understand that America operates as a representative democracy, where elected officials make decisions on behalf of the citizens.

Public comment, while valuable, cannot and should not replace the electoral process.

The truest expression of public sentiment occurs at the ballot box on election day, as intended by the founding fathers.

The repetitive appearances of the same few individuals, such as Suzanne Harris, Alan Osborne, and Barbara Marano, cast a shadow on the democratic nature of public comment.

While everyone has the right to express their opinions, the prevalence of a select few dominating discussions raises questions about the true representativeness of these voices.

The issue extends beyond the local discontent voiced during public comment sessions.

In reality, it undermines the functionality of BCC meetings, making it challenging to address and solve critical problems facing Walton County.

The urgency for reform lies in the fact that these meetings are the only avenue for productive decision-making, and their efficiency is hampered by the exploitation of public comment.

It is a testament to the strength of democracy that individuals can voice their opinions freely. However, this freedom should not be weaponized to disrupt the very system it aims to uphold.

The call for reform is not an assault on free speech but a plea for a more efficient and representative decision-making process that aligns with the principles of our founding fathers.

In the coming months, Walton County will be at a crossroads, considering potential reforms to ensure that public comment remains a platform for genuine citizen input rather than a stage for individual ambitions or political maneuvering.

The challenge lies in striking a balance between openness and efficiency, creating a system that better serves all citizens while upholding the principles of representative democracy.


Agree or disagree with the article?

Your voice matters!

Share your thoughts in the comments.

Effective communication is essential for our local government, involving everyone – citizens, officials, and stakeholders.

Join the conversation and contribute to the dialogue for a better community.

389 views1 comment

1 Comment

Jim McDowell
Jim McDowell
Feb 02

John Walton, you are nuts. Public comments by those citizens you mention, who keep daily track of what is going on in the county is much appreciated and must not be silenced as you suggest!

Jim McDowell

bottom of page