top of page

For Best Experience Download Our Mobile App Here:
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/walco-news/id6478488979

 

Note: If Article does not Load Please Login & Subscribe to a Premium Plan here:
[Special Offer] Use Coupon Code
  "JOHN WALTON" at Checkout to get FREE Access for 1 Year

 

Donna Johns' Troubles: A Constitutional Quandary



Donna Johns, the District 4 County Commissioner, now finds herself entangled in a legal and ethical dilemma, courtesy of her actions in the December 19th meeting – actions that may have set off a chain of consequences she's yet to fully comprehend.


Let's begin with the solemn oath of office, a commitment made by all commissioners in accordance with the Florida Senate.


Swearing to "support, protect, and defend the Constitution and Government of the United States and the State of Florida," Johns undertook a duty that she may have compromised.


The December 19th meeting, where private text messages were presented, raises constitutional concerns, akin to an illegal search and seizure.


Legal experts contend that the absence of identifying marks on the messages implies an intrusive search through the recovered iPad from county administration – potentially constituting an illegal act.


For Johns, who swore an oath to the constitution, this poses grounds for removal.


Further complicating matters is Section 1983, a civil remedy allowing victims to hold government actors accountable for depriving constitutional rights.


Johns' involvement in the discovery of the iPad and the subsequent presentation of private messages qualifies as potential grounds for a Section 1983 lawsuit.


This development indicates that Johns' predicament extends beyond local scrutiny.


Governor DeSantis now holds a critical role in determining the veracity of these claims and deciding the appropriate course of action.


As the investigation by the Walton County Sheriff unfolds, Johns' legal challenges appear distinct from her counterparts.


Depriving citizens of constitutional rights through an illegal search and seizure is a grave violation of the oath of office, and Johns now stands at the precipice of potential legal repercussions.


Resignation may be a prudent consideration, sparing her from the specter of removal by the governor – a decision that will have far-reaching consequences for both Johns and Walton County.


The constitutional quandary she faces is a reminder that, in the pursuit of justice, even elected officials are not above the very laws they pledge to uphold.

293 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

コメント


bottom of page