top of page

For Best Experience Download Our Mobile App Here:


Note: If Article does not Load Please Login & Subscribe to a Premium Plan here:
[Special Offer] Use Coupon Code
  "JOHN WALTON" at Checkout to get FREE Access for 1 Year


Dan Curry: Shifting Audiences, Missing Leadership

In the ever-changing landscape of local politics, it's essential for candidates to demonstrate clarity of purpose and a clear understanding of the responsibilities they seek to undertake.

Unfortunately, recent actions by county commissioner candidate Dan Curry raise questions about his ability to navigate the complexities of public service.

After suffering a significant defeat in the Supervisor of Elections race, where he lost to Ryan Messer in a landslide victory, Curry appears to have shifted his sights to the County Commissioner race in District 1.

However, this shift in focus hasn't been accompanied by a coherent message or consistent approach.

One glaring inconsistency is Curry's recent attacks on the school district, particularly Superintendent Russell Hughes and the esteemed school board, ranked third in the state of Florida.

Hughes, recognized as Florida Superintendent of the Year, has led a remarkable turnaround in the district.

Rather than appreciating this success, Curry seems to be using the school district as a political target.

A recent audit of the school district, a routine practice to identify areas for improvement, became fodder for Curry's political attacks.

Audits are conducted to enhance performance, not as a means for baseless criticism. Curry's lack of understanding regarding this fundamental aspect of governance further highlights his confusion about the office he seeks.

Moreover, Curry's foray into scrutinizing the status of the parks and recreation department raises serious concerns about his leadership style.

Photographing and publicly criticizing lower-level park employees for minor issues not only demonstrates a lack of leadership but also raises questions about his priorities.

Effective leaders uplift their teams, fostering a positive environment, rather than targeting those at the bottom of the hierarchy.

Leadership is about inspiring and uniting, not tearing down individuals doing their best in their roles. Curry's approach seems to reflect a penchant for pointing fingers rather than offering constructive solutions.

True leaders, like Superintendent Russell Hughes, focus on achievements and collaborative progress.

It's time for Curry to choose a path – either a constructive leader focused on the responsibilities of the office he seeks or a perpetual critic, shifting audiences without a clear vision.

The electorate deserves leaders who prioritize their duties and work towards improving the community.

Aspiring to public office demands a commitment to genuine leadership, something Dan Curry appears to lack.

In conclusion, Dan Curry's recent actions raise doubts about his suitability for public office.

Instead of being a jealous whiner, Curry should reflect on the qualities of true leaders and consider whether he is truly equipped for the responsibilities of the county commissioner role.

Continuing down this path may risk digging a hole too deep to escape, potentially harming the very community he claims to serve.

1,329 views0 comments


bottom of page